AP/David Zalubowski
« "Look at me, I'm John McCain!" | Main | Tsk, tsk, tsk, McCain campaign... »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf82953ef01053598fbaf970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Here, you can throw this in the trunk.":
The comments to this entry are closed.

Weird how she is always carrying her son facing forward, when the more comfortable position for a child is to have them over your shoulder. I guess we do not want any spittle on the jacket.
Country First.
Children Last.
Posted by: zoe | October 21, 2008 at 11:55 AM
Does CaribouBarbie not know how to hold a child?
Hell, I don't even have any children and I could do a better job that that!
Posted by: Sharktattoo | October 21, 2008 at 12:10 PM
have we ever seen Pa Tawd carry the young one?
Posted by: punaise | October 21, 2008 at 12:17 PM
That poor kid seems to always be treated like a book bag or an unnecessary piece of luggage. Just hand him off to the kids or the porter and move right along.
Why is he there in the first place?
Posted by: Rene ala Carte | October 21, 2008 at 12:18 PM
I've only seen perhaps one time that she's held this baby properly. She definitely wants to make sure he doesn't spit up on her lovely clothes that Grampa John bought her. Dang, has she ever thought of putting a cloth over her shoulder so she can hold the baby properly AND not look like she hates holding him?
Nice look on her face, too. "Get this stinky thing away from me".
Posted by: amused | October 21, 2008 at 12:18 PM
"Family values" my left buttock!!! I carry the trash w/more respect than she's giving that poor child.
Elspeth
Posted by: Elspeth R | October 21, 2008 at 12:21 PM
I don't know I think he's got Willow's paunch.
Posted by: queek | October 21, 2008 at 12:37 PM
at first glance I thought, "woah, watertiger, that's a bit harsh." Upon further contemplation I have reconsidered that assessment.
Posted by: punaise | October 21, 2008 at 01:09 PM
Uhhhh what the fuck is her facination withn red on top black on the bottom these days???? It seems that is all she has been wearing.
Posted by: frogspond | October 21, 2008 at 01:48 PM
Why is he there in the first place?
It's important to accesorize.
Posted by: Molly Ivors | October 21, 2008 at 01:54 PM
I would guess that the little guy is definitely being breastfed, due to his wonderful plumpness. At least that's something, I suppose.
Posted by: jane_al | October 21, 2008 at 03:03 PM
Red and black are lucky - if you're Korean.
Posted by: Caveat | October 21, 2008 at 03:11 PM
Nothing like flashing an unearned maternal badge for a bit of fundie street cred.
Red and black? - Mebbe she's trying to pay tribute to Stendhal...What am I saying, that's preeminently preposterous.
;>)
Posted by: darkblack | October 21, 2008 at 03:40 PM
no brown stripes, but doesn't deserve color?
Posted by: pansypoo | October 21, 2008 at 04:17 PM
I haven't seen a picture yet where she is holding the baby face forward. It sure doesn't look comfortable for him. And the body language of turning him away from herself is sure potent.
Posted by: tulipdog | October 21, 2008 at 06:53 PM
Trig is being treated as an anti-Amurikan.
Posted by: moeman | October 21, 2008 at 07:33 PM
That's the first time I've seen that kid awake. He sleeps a lot, even for a baby.
Posted by: Pissed in NYC | October 21, 2008 at 08:45 PM
Sarah breast feeding? Yah, right. Don't think so with everything else she's got going on.
This ain't her kid and she is pissed, pissed to be a grandma at 44.
Posted by: moistenedbink | October 21, 2008 at 08:55 PM
punaise - good call. I haven't seen Duh Tawd doing anything remotely paternal with the kids. Especially with the baby.
Can't help but speculate on how close he is to Trig. Paternally.
Then again, Willow, Piper and Bristol are far more maternal to the baby than mommy is. Whenever you see the older girls carry the baby, they are actually holding him properly.
I guess it isn't fair to draw a comparison that since Duh Tawd doesn't hold the baby, that Tawd may not be the father. Even though there were rumors (via court papers) that Sarah had an affair with Duh Tawd's "business partner", and he's never been seen holding the baby once...
aw, perhaps he just considers it "woman's work".
It wouldn't be fair to speculate...
Posted by: amused | October 21, 2008 at 09:13 PM
Kid's doin' his McSame imitation, heh heh
Posted by: NOTeasy | October 21, 2008 at 09:16 PM
I bet ya she plays cornhole with that kid in the hotel room.
Posted by: Capt. Bat Guano | October 21, 2008 at 10:51 PM
Maybe she needs some child rearing lessons from the Spears?
Red on top of black? Sounds like interacial porn.
Posted by: Jay Severin Has A Small Pen1s | October 22, 2008 at 08:56 AM
I'll eat my hat if that child is even actually hers. I still think it's Willow's and Sarah is just covering. Do you think Sarah looks even VAGUELY post-partem??? Willow's the one with the post-delivery paunch.
Posted by: Lisa | October 22, 2008 at 12:28 PM
breastfed babies are leaner, this baby is not breastfed, he's bottle fed. there is a correlation between weight and sleep with babies, heavier babies sleep more.
Posted by: twobears | October 22, 2008 at 01:01 PM